Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 09:09

Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
What’s next?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
What do you think of Andrew Tate's 'PhD' course?
Thank you.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Mario Kart World Guide - All Courses, Cups, Missions, Collectibles, Tips & Tricks - Nintendo Life
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Is Billie Piper Playing the Doctor or Rose? 5 Theories About ‘Doctor Who’ Twist - TV Insider
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
How do I find a luxury service apartment in Gurgaon?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
What was the worst spanking you ever got? Why did you get it, and how was it given to you?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.